News

[Discuss] Status ?

Marc J. polyticks04 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 22:44:21 CEST 2006


On 7/3/06, Marc J. wrote:
>
> ...which is what should have been said in the beginning instead of "the
> player should have his account banned/locked/deleted".
>
> However, in fairness to Tom/other GM's, this subject is covered under the
> blanket statement:
>

I apologise for replying to myself, but I just realised that my sentence
structure wasn't very clear:

My first sentence was intended toward AIM, (the guy who said that the player
who RP'ed the bolt-worthy rape should have their account deleted) and NOT
toward Tom/other GM's.

I added the part about Tom/other GM's to say that the bolted player had no
"I didn't know" defence about the graphic-ness part...

[Figured I'd send this for those of you who skim-read/aren't native English
speakers and might think I'm mis-placing blame]

-- 
Marc J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060703/5c60ab10/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list