[Discuss] Re: Duels under appreciated?

[Josiah Allen]

On 12/19/06, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Jonathon Taylor wrote:
> >
> > They should indeed, they should always either end in a one noble with
> > a serious injury, or a death.
> >
> >
> They do now.  Tom took out duels to first blood.
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>


Along this line...

I know some may disagree with me, but I think there is too much difference
between 10% skill and 80% skill.

A noble, I would imagine, since he starts as a knight, should have trained
for years with a sword, and thus each noble should at the least have a 1/5
shot against any other one given the probabilities of it.   I think it would
make those good swordmasters confident but still not invincible, which is
how they act now.  Just my 2 cents.


-- 
"Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061219/46a927af/attachment.htm