News

[Discuss] OR Rebellion

Aaron Champion achampion at gmail.com
Wed Dec 13 16:51:00 CET 2006


On 12/13/06, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >From: "Aaron Champion" <achampion at gmail.com>
> >Then, with all due respect to Tom, that's stupid.  If characters are to
> be
> >considered part of a family (which he's said they are), then it logically
> >follows that they would at least partially be judged by their family.  I
> >can
> >understand that some people might take it a little too far and so a
> blanket
> >"no judging by family" is necessary, but still.  A lot of these rule
> >problems would be cleared up by consistency.
>
> But characters already are partially judged by family; that's why we have
> the fame stat.


That doesn't really address the issue of judging a family history for a
particular character's potential, however.  I'm sure a lot of us have used
the old "my family has ample experience in X" pitch when campaigning; fame
doesn't have anything to do with that, it's simply a measure of how well
your family name would be known.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061213/1eace451/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list