[Discuss] OR Rebellion

[Anthony Cerqueira]

On 12/11/06, Robert Croson, Jr <robert at arcm.com> wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2006 at 14:06, Anthony Cerqueira wrote:
>
> > On 12/11/06, Robert Croson, Jr <robert at arcm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There were some dual-character shenanigans going on in the original KI
> > > rebellion.
> >
> > Actually that rebellion had only one character per player, (and one
> > account per player) The funny part was that two seperate, rebel groups
> > managed to meet up at the same time, which allowed them to succeed.
>
> OK, I can believe that the actual rebellion itself was done as a "one character
> per account" thing. Howefver, I know that in at least one major case, there
> were multiple characters per account soon after the rebellion. The most
> infamous case being the rebel leader himself bringing a second character over
> to the realm as soon as it succeded. This allowed him to have his second
> character reap the rewards of the rebellion (rulership, dukeship, etc.), while
> letting the original character take all the blame.
>
> This isn't the only case, though. Following the influx of Avamarians, there were
> quite a few people who had, and still have, multiple characters in the KI/AS
> realms.

-shrug- I do sometimes wonder what the problem is.... I mean usually
countries have to spend a lot of money to set up penal colonies for
their undesirables, but these people have done it for free! They've
roped all of their characters in and fiercly defend their own prison.
Heck throw down some militia and there's not much they can do besides
stab eachother. :)

I mean the alternative to the KI/Selective thing would be to have all
the "trouble makers" spread out over the east. Of course this plan
involves less killing and that's a major draw back.