[Discuss] Inaleignable rights; rule 2.

[Jonas De Greef]

>Here's the page that the game itself directs elected government members 
>(including judges) to: 
>http://wiki.battlemaster.org/index.php/Government_rules

How does that explain the fact it (being: not punishing people for 
disobedience) was posted on the login-screen? I'm not the only one who 
remembers that it happened, and what it contained, so I'm pretty sure my 
info is correct...
BTW: it doesn't mention anything about punishing disobeyment (given it has 
nothing to do with inactivity)

>You are generalizing, and falsely. Your character was bolted for a very 
>specific event. BM is not a world of case law, where you can derive the 
>rules from whatever happens through the Titans or me.  It works the other 
>way around: There are rules and the Titans and Tom enforce them and decide 
>how they apply in the specific circumstances of the individual case.

Indeed, lets please stay shortminded and assume that any example someone 
uses, is a protest against what happened. I was not saying I was falsly 
bolted, I was saying that the message on the login-page appeared the day 
after I was lighteningbolted. In case some knew my character, some people 
would know when that happened and maybe remember what I was talking about. 
Actually, now I mention it, there was a huge fuss about the coïncidence that 
those two things happened at the same time, so it is most likely that people 
will remember it when I mention this fact, because it was talked about at 
the same time.

So, to get back to the point: may you, or may you not as general include in 
your orders which unit-type you would suggest or prefer.

And now also, for clarification: may you, or may you not punish someone for 
having the wrong settings, or moving to the wrong region or...

_________________________________________________________________
Ben je niet zo levendig als je hond? Live.be wel! http://www.live.be