[Discuss] Inaleignable rights; rule 2.

[Thomas Dalton]

> Thomas, for once can you read an entire email?  I think you just love to
> spam everyone's mail boxes without doing so.  The entire email was about
> recruiting a unit, he saying we don't follow the general now so he wants
> to get rid of it, however, what I would have said is, there are still
> people that can order us to get a particular unit, so the rule needs to
> stay.  Just because the general doesn't give the order doesn't mean that
> someone else doing it is right.

I read the whole email. It was all based on the fact that you used to
have to obey the general and now you don't, which is something I've
never heard of before. There was no point replying to the whole thing
when it's all null and void if the initial assumption is wrong. He
insists in his reply that there is a new rule about not punishing
disobedience, so perhaps I've missed something, but an email being
wrong doesn't make it spam.