[Discuss] Religion

[Chuong Huynh]

On 12/1/06, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >From: Kylie <gazky at bigpond.com.au>
> >
> >One of the region lords offered to step down temporarily to allow a noble
> >to found a religion, if he was reinstated to his position afterwards.  I
> >know this this doesn't follow the true game mechanics, as to found a
> >religion you should be an influential region Lord and this player would
> >only be holding the region for one purpose - to found a religion.
> >
> >Would it be wrong to do this?  If it was heavily roleplayed would it be
> >acceptable?
> >
> >I don't like side-stepping the game mechanics in this way, the only
> reason
> >I would consider doing this is to allow the players that want to explore
> >the new options and start using the new class to do so.
>
> It was done elsewhere months ago on testing, to facilitate the founding of
> a
> religion. Don't think anyone had any problems with it. The duke agreed to
> step down to allow the religion to be founded and was reappointed
> afterwards. Admittedly, we were a theocracy so the religion played a
> bigger
> part in our realm affairs...
>
> The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)


It was also on testing when religions needed to be tested, I think that
played a part in people not voicing any objections to it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061201/9c082705/attachment.htm