[Discuss] Religion

[Justin Licht]

On 11/30/06, Chuong Huynh <chuongbm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/30/06, Kylie <gazky at bigpond.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > With the implementation of religion on stable, there are many people
> > interested in founding and following a religion, and trying the priest
> > class.  However, none of the region lords in my realm are interested in
> > it.
> >
> > One of the region lords offered to step down temporarily to allow a
> > noble to found a religion, if he was reinstated to his position
> > afterwards.  I know this this doesn't follow the true game mechanics, as
> > to found a religion you should be an influential region Lord and this
> > player would only be holding the region for one purpose - to found a
> > religion.
> >
> > Would it be wrong to do this?  If it was heavily roleplayed would it be
> > acceptable?
> >
> > I don't like side-stepping the game mechanics in this way, the only
> > reason I would consider doing this is to allow the players that want to
> > explore the new options and start using the new class to do so.
>
>
> Its been a long since Ive been a priest and I dont remember if you need to
> be at a temple to change class to a priest.   But in short religions can
> cross realm bounderies, have your nobles go join religions in other realms
> if they really want to play a priest.  Founding a religion costs a decent
> amount of gold so no regular noble would be able to afford it anyways.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


You have to be in your realm and at a temple of at least size 3. 100% sure
on this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061130/6ab802f5/attachment.htm