[Discuss] Religion

[Chuong Huynh]

On 11/30/06, Kylie <gazky at bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>
> With the implementation of religion on stable, there are many people
> interested in founding and following a religion, and trying the priest
> class.  However, none of the region lords in my realm are interested in
> it.
>
> One of the region lords offered to step down temporarily to allow a
> noble to found a religion, if he was reinstated to his position
> afterwards.  I know this this doesn't follow the true game mechanics, as
> to found a religion you should be an influential region Lord and this
> player would only be holding the region for one purpose - to found a
> religion.
>
> Would it be wrong to do this?  If it was heavily roleplayed would it be
> acceptable?
>
> I don't like side-stepping the game mechanics in this way, the only
> reason I would consider doing this is to allow the players that want to
> explore the new options and start using the new class to do so.


Its been a long since Ive been a priest and I dont remember if you need to
be at a temple to change class to a priest.   But in short religions can
cross realm bounderies, have your nobles go join religions in other realms
if they really want to play a priest.  Founding a religion costs a decent
amount of gold so no regular noble would be able to afford it anyways.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061130/ffd1dd5f/attachment.htm