[Discuss] Another use for claims.

[James]

Alex Davies wrote:
>> From: "Dorian Gray" <portrait.of.dorian.gray at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
>> <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>> To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" 
>> <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Another use for claims.
>> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:50:55 +1000
>>
>> If people played by the spirit of mechanics and not by the code of
>> mechanics, the fact that you could appoint a region lord in a region 
>> with a
>> claim on it wouldn't be a problem as you wouldn't bother trying 
>> anyway. I
>> think the word on claims has been spread out enough that anyone in a
>> position where they're appointing region lords should know about 
>> claims and
>> how they work.
>
>
> Ar Mosul
> Ibladesh (imperial region)
> Unresolved claim of Perdan
> ----
> Local Lord: Dread
>
> Nope. They're broke, or at least not finished.
>
> <speculation>I believe, from what I hve seen and heard, if the region 
> goes rogue from any owner then the effect of the claim will be lifted, 
> but the line of text only disappears if it goes rogue from the realm 
> that had the claim.</speculation>
There are ways around it, but it is still working.  (The following is 
speculation)  If you appointed someone before it went into effect, you 
can have a region lord or if someone bought the title you can.