[Discuss] Another use for claims.
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Thu Aug 31 11:06:55 CEST 2006
>From: "Dorian Gray" <portrait.of.dorian.gray at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Another use for claims.
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:50:55 +1000
>
>If people played by the spirit of mechanics and not by the code of
>mechanics, the fact that you could appoint a region lord in a region with a
>claim on it wouldn't be a problem as you wouldn't bother trying anyway. I
>think the word on claims has been spread out enough that anyone in a
>position where they're appointing region lords should know about claims and
>how they work.
Ar Mosul
Ibladesh (imperial region)
Unresolved claim of Perdan
----
Local Lord: Dread
Nope. They're broke, or at least not finished.
<speculation>I believe, from what I hve seen and heard, if the region goes
rogue from any owner then the effect of the claim will be lifted, but the
line of text only disappears if it goes rogue from the realm that had the
claim.</speculation>
The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)
The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb
More information about the Discuss
mailing list