[Discuss] Change to positions
Josiah Allen
josiahallen at gmail.com
Fri Aug 18 16:56:22 CEST 2006
On 8/18/06, Tom <tom at lemuria.org> wrote:
> LilWolf wrote:
> > I'd rather have temporary replacements and a small chance of a change
> > in ruler than no chance at all. That goes double for region lord
> > positions. There's already very few changes in those positions and
> > this will effectively make it so that region lord positions change
> > only when someone goes away for OOC reasons or decides to be nice and
> > give someone else a go at it. This change is a step back for BM and
> > reduces its appeal in my opinion(less chances for new players and
> > characters, the same people hold the power as long as they want. These
> > are all *bad* things for the game).
> Don't worry, there'll be change.
>
> I have a few things in the pipe. For example, now that your prisoners
> can actually be people of power, how about keeping them longer and for a
> higher ransom? King Richard was kept for ransom for how long? A few years?
>
>
> > In my view, the issue was never about the damage the realm would
> > suffer from the ruler getting stabbed.
> No, because that wasn't a problem so far. It'll be now. Which, in turn,
> will make *the players* ask for change and a new ruler, instead of him
> being forced on them.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
I still like my idea of a chosen steward or chancillor who would rule
in the kings stead, but have the option to usurp before he returns.
--
"Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"
More information about the Discuss
mailing list