[Discuss] Temporary position holders

[Gloria Santos]

On 8/1/06, Björn Falkenström <falkenstrom at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "I agree!
>
> How people like to play should come before anything "the rules" say they
> should play.  As Tom refuses to have written rules for this game, it is the
> players who determine how it shall be played.  DA was re-elected King
> because that's what the players and their characters want."
>
> That is interesting considering that when I brought up on the discussion
> list that I liked to play characters in enemy realms but couldn´t hold
> council positions in both (which make that I need to choose, which you can´t
> do as a roleplayers as all characters are equally important), you, Gloria,
> specificly told me that you didn´t want me, Björn, to play more positions
> and let others have a shot at it, and that is why that restriction was good.
> Reading what you just wrote, you could think you have turned around
> completely ;)
>




I still think holding two council positions in one same continent would be a
bit selfish because you wouldn't give a chance to other people.

But  "eternal legitimate constantly reelected rulers" are a whole different
issue.  And I happen to like them.

But maybe you are right about having turned around now that my RL country is
going to  hell because we have *finally* become a democracy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060801/4f445ae5/attachment.htm