[Discuss] Ruler rotation

[Josiah Allen]

On 8/1/06, Eric Kenseth <eurtek at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/1/06, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > >From: "Gloria Santos" <gloria.santos at gmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> > >< discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
> > >To: "BattleMaster general discussion list"
> <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
> > >Subject: Re: [Discuss] Ruler rotation
> > >Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:25:22 -0500
> > >
> > >On 8/1/06, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >What players
> > >>want is an OOC consideration, and requires OOC ways of making it
> > >>happen.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >OOC ways of making something happen that wouldn't make sense IC?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Surviving assassinations and being voted back 1 day after doesn't make
> sense
> > IC either.
>
>
> Not dieing and there even BEING elections doesn't make sense IC.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>

Elections were quite common.  remember, the electors are the nobles,
which are like 1% of the population.  Even some Roman Caesers were
chosen by the senate this way.

I would institute a 'regent' or 'chamberlain' position in the game, to
act during a king's serious wounds if you wanted to make this issue
more realistic.

-- 
"Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"