[Discuss] Temporary position holders

[Alex Davies]

>From: "Björn Falkenström" <falkenstrom at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Temporary position holders
>Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:01:56 +0200
>
>"I agree!
>
>How people like to play should come before anything "the rules" say they
>should play.  As Tom refuses to have written rules for this game, it is the
>players who determine how it shall be played.  DA was re-elected King
>because that's what the players and their characters want."
>
>That is interesting considering that when I brought up on the discussion
>list that I liked to play characters in enemy realms but couldn´t hold
>council positions in both (which make that I need to choose, which you 
>can´t
>do as a roleplayers as all characters are equally important), you, Gloria,
>specificly told me that you didn´t want me, Björn, to play more positions
>and let others have a shot at it, and that is why that restriction was 
>good.
>Reading what you just wrote, you could think you have turned around
>completely ;)

You might be one of those who actually hate that restriction, but it's still 
there.

As Gloria says, it is the players who decide how we play, but the minority 
nearly always bows to the majority.

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each 
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters