News

[Discuss] Temporary position holders

Marc J. polyticks04 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 1 02:24:10 CEST 2006


On 7/31/06, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> OOC, it is a requirement, for the game to be fun for everyone, that it be
> possible to change rulers without the characters in the realm in question
> wanting the change.  At the moment, that is impossible if people just
> re-elect the old ruler after they are removed.
>

So, essentially, we're supposed to have an RP reason for most things, but if
we, (as a realm) do an RP that is allowed by the realm machanics and that is
perfectly logical, we have to stop because there's an OOC componet to it.

"The issue of ruler turnover is an OOC one, so please stop bringing IC
justifications into the discussion."

If we're not supposed to bring IC OOC, why are we bringing OOC IC?

-- 
Marc J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060731/f0acfd61/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list