[Discuss] Constitution of Avamar. Article 8. Rewording.
Björn Falkenström
falkenstrom at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 22:46:49 CEST 2005
I ask again, have you read it? this time to jens.
I never says that you cannot use the protest option in-game, and that is the
second time I say it here.
Tom also said that it is not your right to protest, like torunament etc, and
therefore a realm can theoreticly have harsh punishments for it.
On 9/20/05, jens svensson <jenstheno1 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Update:
> The three day limit of course has nothing to do with bans either?
>
>
> >From: "jens svensson" <jenstheno1 at hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> ><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
> >To: discuss at news.battlemaster.org
> >Subject: RE: [Discuss] Constitution of Avamar. Article 8. Rewording.
> >Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:50:31 +0200
> >
> >Actually its a discusslist thing in my opinion as the article imposes
> >restrictions on a players right to protest against the government
> in-game.
> >And what is the penalty for a player that protests in-game using the
> >options of the game without telling the rest of the realm of the reason
> >he/she is angry?
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: Gloria Santos <gloria.santos at gmail.com>
> >>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> >><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
> >>To: BattleMaster general discussion list <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
> >>Subject: [Discuss] Constitution of Avamar. Article 8. Rewording.
> >>Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:07:30 -0500
> >>
> >>It now currently reads:
> >>
> >>"Art. 8 Every Avamarian can announce formally his/her disagreement with
> a
> >>member of the council, count, marshal, BG Leader, for any reason he
> >>believes
> >>and ask for his/her retirement. In case that 10% of citizens (round up)
> >>express a formal disagreement, the Judge is obliged to hold a referendum
> >>as
> >>soon as possible (no more than 3 days). In order to be valid, 50% (round
> >>up)
> >>of Citizens must vote, otherwise the request is discarded. If the
> majority
> >>of voters favour the retirement option, the individual in question must
> >>step
> >>down or be striped of duties and forcibly expelled. In case that the
> above
> >>procedure is not followed by the Government every citizens is fully
> >>entitled
> >>to use the *formal protest procedure* against the individual noble
> >>*and/or*the Government.
> >>
> >>Art.9 Referendums can be asked for any reason (e.g political, military,
> >>diplomatic decisions, disagreements, appointments, banishments), 10%
> >>(round
> >>up) of citizens support, with the procedures mentioned in Art.8. In that
> >>case, the Government is obliged to execute the People's will within 1
> week
> >>"
> >>
> >>
> >>Shall read:
> >>
> >>"Article 8.
> >>
> >>Every Avamarian who wishes to express his or her disagreement with an
> >>action
> >>taken by a member of the council, count, marshal, or BG Leader, must
> must
> >>message the realm stating which action he disagrees with, (i.e. post a
> >>message to the realm, do not use the Disagree/Protest link on your
> action
> >>screen.)
> >>
> >>If an Avamarian believes that a member of the council, count, marshal,
> or
> >>BG
> >>Leader must retire, he or she must write a petition to the realm (i.e.
> >>post
> >>a message to the realm, do not use the Disagree/Protest link on your
> >>action
> >>screen.)
> >>
> >>If this petition is signed by 10% of the Avamarian Citizens, the Judge
> >>must
> >>hold a referendum as soon as possible. Avamarian citizens are to vote in
> >>favor or against the referendum. If less than 50% of the Citizens vote,
> >>the
> >>Judge must discard the referendum.
> >>
> >>If more than 50% of the Citizens vote, and more than 50% of the voters
> >>favor
> >>the retirement of the member of a council, count, marshal, or BG leader,
> >>then the individual in question must step down of his duties or be
> >>forcibly
> >>expelled.
> >>
> >>In case that the above procedure is not followed by the Government every
> >>citizens is fully entitled to use the *formal protest procedure* against
> >>the
> >>individual noble *and/or* the Government."
> >
> >
> >>--
> >>Unsubscribing and other list options:
> >>http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >--
> >Unsubscribing and other list options:
> >http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050920/ff139e1f/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list