[Discuss] Accusations against Titans and Developers

[Björn Falkenström]

"I think it has been flameless so far which is what is bad right?"

I mean of course that it is the flaming that is bad.

On 9/4/05, Björn Falkenström <falkenstrom at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Do you understand what I mean? We try to discuss it and the thread gets 
> closed which is exactly my point. I think it has been flameless so far which 
> is what is bad right?
> What Paris told you is true with many others aswell, and after I saw what 
> happend with them, I didn´t dare to vote in the inquesition even though I 
> got evidence, as they got locked before even showing any evidence at all, or 
> getting the chance to do so. I am sure that is true with more than me, so 
> just think that they should have gotten even more votes in the inquesition. 
> Nothing happends with them as far as I know, and one of them gets choosen as 
> a titan of that very island. It has nothing to do if 1 titan can´t do 
> anything alone. This has to do with the bad choosing of 1 titan and not 
> doing anything about those that got many many many votes in the inquesition. 
> Frankly, if he got choosen as a titan, there is a chance that 2 or 3 of such 
> character could control one island. I suggest that Tom makes all titans 
> responsible for islands which they have never played on, if that is 
> possible.
> 
> "If someone ever gets locked
> for protesting, it's probably because they can't listen to reason and 
> won't
> stop."
> 
> I do not think that is true in this case, atleast with those I have seen.
> 
> On 9/3/05, Roy McGhie <r.a.s.mcghie at sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > Björn wrote:
> > >The problem I see is that many many many has
> > >expressed their dislike when Titans who has played on one island for 
> > what
> > >many would consider to be a long time and then get choosen to become 
> > the 
> > >titan over that island. Also when other titans has been choosen who has
> > >expressed themselves, clearly showing bias.
> > 
> > I only know one open Titan (the one who was revealed to everyone on this 
> > list),
> > so I don't know if what you say about there being multiple ones with 
> > bias is
> > true, but surely the fact that Tom has said due to the council system 1 
> > titan
> > alone cannot do anything is enough of a safe-guard for you? I'm pretty 
> > sure the 
> > majority of the titans were picked partly because they want the best for 
> > the
> > game, so if they see one of themselves showing a blatent bias, he would
> > probably get dropped.
> > 
> > >Then people protest and if they 
> > >protest, they get locked accounts, then people won´t dare to protest 
> > because
> > >they get locked accounts if they do. Those who does anyway brings it 
> > here
> > >and they get moderated. Evidence of many things has been sent to Tom 
> > but it 
> > >goes on and on. It is like an irl or OOC tyrrany.
> > 
> > Again, I only know what I see on the list and in the game, but I have 
> > seen no
> > evidence whatsoever of BM being run like a tyranny. If someone ever gets 
> > locked 
> > for protesting, it's probably because they can't listen to reason and 
> > won't
> > stop. Maybe I move around in the wrong circles, but from everything I 
> > have ever
> > seen, I have only seen Tom run his game with absoulte fairness. To 
> > suggest 
> > anything otherwise just seems...wrong.
> > 
> > --
> > Unsubscribing and other list options:
> > http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss 
> > 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050904/e398ab24/attachment.htm