[Discuss] Accusations against Titans and Developers

[Björn Falkenström]

Do you understand what I mean? We try to discuss it and the thread gets 
closed which is exactly my point. I think it has been flameless so far which 
is what is bad right?
What Paris told you is true with many others aswell, and after I saw what 
happend with them, I didn´t dare to vote in the inquesition even though I 
got evidence, as they got locked before even showing any evidence at all, or 
getting the chance to do so. I am sure that is true with more than me, so 
just think that they should have gotten even more votes in the inquesition. 
Nothing happends with them as far as I know, and one of them gets choosen as 
a titan of that very island. It has nothing to do if 1 titan can´t do 
anything alone. This has to do with the bad choosing of 1 titan and not 
doing anything about those that got many many many votes in the inquesition. 
Frankly, if he got choosen as a titan, there is a chance that 2 or 3 of such 
character could control one island. I suggest that Tom makes all titans 
responsible for islands which they have never played on, if that is 
possible.

"If someone ever gets locked
for protesting, it's probably because they can't listen to reason and won't
stop."

I do not think that is true in this case, atleast with those I have seen.

On 9/3/05, Roy McGhie <r.a.s.mcghie at sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Björn wrote:
> >The problem I see is that many many many has
> >expressed their dislike when Titans who has played on one island for what
> >many would consider to be a long time and then get choosen to become the
> >titan over that island. Also when other titans has been choosen who has
> >expressed themselves, clearly showing bias.
> 
> I only know one open Titan (the one who was revealed to everyone on this 
> list),
> so I don't know if what you say about there being multiple ones with bias 
> is
> true, but surely the fact that Tom has said due to the council system 1 
> titan
> alone cannot do anything is enough of a safe-guard for you? I'm pretty 
> sure the
> majority of the titans were picked partly because they want the best for 
> the
> game, so if they see one of themselves showing a blatent bias, he would
> probably get dropped.
> 
> >Then people protest and if they
> >protest, they get locked accounts, then people won´t dare to protest 
> because
> >they get locked accounts if they do. Those who does anyway brings it here
> >and they get moderated. Evidence of many things has been sent to Tom but 
> it
> >goes on and on. It is like an irl or OOC tyrrany.
> 
> Again, I only know what I see on the list and in the game, but I have seen 
> no
> evidence whatsoever of BM being run like a tyranny. If someone ever gets 
> locked
> for protesting, it's probably because they can't listen to reason and 
> won't
> stop. Maybe I move around in the wrong circles, but from everything I have 
> ever
> seen, I have only seen Tom run his game with absoulte fairness. To suggest
> anything otherwise just seems...wrong.
> 
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050904/4e2fd92b/attachment.htm