News

[Discuss] Accusations against Titans and Developers

Björn Falkenström falkenstrom at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 20:07:29 CEST 2005


Sorry for being too late on this, but my internet has not fuctioned until 
now. I agree that even if Tom chooses them, there aren´t going to be a 
garantee for good titans. The problem I see is that many many many has 
expressed their dislike when Titans who has played on one island for what 
many would consider to be a long time and then get choosen to become the 
titan over that island. Also when other titans has been choosen who has 
expressed themselves, clearly showing bias. Then people protest and if they 
protest, they get locked accounts, then people won´t dare to protest because 
they get locked accounts if they do. Those who does anyway brings it here 
and they get moderated. Evidence of many things has been sent to Tom but it 
goes on and on. It is like an irl or OOC tyrrany. I believe it becomes 
flaming because it upsets people too much and I really understand why they 
get upset when this is going on. Usual critisism does not seem to be enough 
to change anything concerning that matter. 

About keeping them public or unknown, both have good and bad points so it is 
hard to choose.

Espire, many might be jelous but don´t count in everyone. I can be a cynic 
too, but that is underestimating people (and I never thought that would come 
from me.)

On 8/31/05, Vinnie <vinnietje at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> AJ wrote:
> > If you or people do not have trust in the Titans, then you are 
> indirectly
> > doubting Tom. Because, I am sure he has thought about it and chosen the
> > Titans without any bias or preference. As has already been demonstrated, 
> the
> > few Titans who have revealed themselves have not received 
> criticism(which
> > can be a good thing) but only open and insulting flames.
> 
> That is absolute bullshit. I'm not doubting Tom's good intentions, or
> Tom's capability of picking good players to do the titans job. I have
> no doubt that he isn't biased when he picked them. But that doesn't
> give any warrancy for perfect Titans, does it? There is a good lot of
> Titans out there, of which some will work perfectly fine, others won't
> work just as fine. But even if they work fine, rumours are going to
> start if people don't know they work fine. That's what you get with
> the secrecy.
> 
> 2005/8/31, Tom <tom at lemuria.org>:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:35:34PM +0200, Vinnie wrote:
> > > Which still makes me wonder why we can't know identities of titans.
> >
> > Because experience shows that people with a gripe do not abstain from
> > personal attacks, and that is something I want to protect my Titans
> > from, given that they all give of their free time with no compensation
> > whatsoever.
> 
> That is one very good arguement as well.
> 
> It indeed is a problem that comes with transparancy. The only way to
> solve that would be to give the Titans enough power to deal with the
> personal attacks in an appropriate way.
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050903/08a12618/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list