[Discuss] Oaths of fealty and their confliction with

[Boštjan Pajntar]

> Well, I think that pretty much settles it. Note that in each of the
> above statements, the one at the bottom takes precedence. And each of
> my characters is in an army, and the third is even SIC.
>
> You obey your liege's orders first, since he gives you money. You
> follow your Marshal's orders second, since your liege told you to
> listen to him in your spare time.
In all the examples you provided it says nothing of an army. Shure I 
first follow my Lord then my Duke and then the King.

However, assigning a knight to an army is not a matter to be taken 
lightly.  The marshal has the right to order. Any member that doesn't 
follow his orders for whatever reson, is a deserter.

And this is good. Why o why must there be a one and only one chain of 
command.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss