[Discuss] Starting more wars

[Tom Vogt]

Matt Runyon schrieb:
> requirements need to be directly correlated to gold income for the 
> region), but it works from a roleplay perspective.  It does NOT work 
> from an efficiency perspective, and most people think about it from a 
> standard gaming point of view, i.e. What is going to be most efficient?  
> THAT is why you see people begging for gold, AND why you see Dukes and 
> the like actually handing it out.  As far as I know (and what the 
> standard consensus is among the military-minded that I've talked to), 
> the most efficient use of gold is to have everyone in the army with the 
> same number of the highest quality of men the realm can afford.
>
> Until and unless the most efficient path to personal gain no longer 
> mainly goes through realms, this isn't going to change.  Until and 
> unless an individual noble can be selfish and see real gains from it, 
> then this isn't going to change.
>   

I've had one more idea regarding this:

What about the gold/bonds difference? Would it be an incentive if your 
local tax share were delivered in gold, not bonds? I think a lot of 
people would like that and it would make the local tax share more 
valuable, wouldn't it?



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss