[Discuss] All realms feudal monarchies?

[LilWolf]

John P. Murphy wrote:
>
> If the inability to use special-colored messages marked "Orders" 
> completely prevents your tyrant being feared, then your tyrant sucks.

Rulers, and tyrants by that extension, don't really have much power left 
with which they could strike fear into even an lowly knight. A duke is 
more powerful and feared than a tyrant on any given day and that's just sad.

>>  What i want is that we arent forced to play English nobles, instead 
>> of that let us build our own hierarchy, chain of command, army 
>> structure...
>
> I agree with this, but Tom has said that other changes are coming.  It 
> would not kill us to try it this way for a while -- y'know, whine 
> *after* the fact instead of before we've given it a shot.

Many of the recent changes are making Battlemaster less a game and more 
an medieval simulator. Whether that's fun or not really depends on the 
player. Personally, I'm leaning towards the no.

>
> Third, who cares if you lose a few battles because orders didn't get out?

I'd say quite a few of any given realms players. They'll blame the 
marshal/general/whoever and make him feel like crap.

-- 
Join the Last.fm group for Battlemaster. See what the BMers listen to.
http://www.last.fm/group/Battlemaster



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss