[Discuss] remove "Orders"

[Lyle Esau]

Jaune Cosula wrote:
> 2008/2/4, Timothy Collett <danaris at mac.com <mailto:danaris at mac.com>>:
>
>     Now, I'm not saying I agree with this idea: frankly, I don't think
>     it'll have any practical effect aside from the removal of one
>     message type and the changing of another.  But it's not entirely
>     wrong to say that you can't order nobles around if they don't have
>     an oath to you.
>
>
>  
> Your liege whom you have sworn oath has assigned you to the army and 
> expects you to obey its marshalls orders as his own. Ofcourse you can 
> ask your liege to confirm every order they get... but still at army 
> you get orders... army without orders is not army for god sakes...
Thats why I have a rule in my oath saying I only have to work 3 months 
for my liege by following his orders. If he assigns me to an army and 
says its time to work off those 3 months, then I'll listen to the 
marshall. But if my liege just assigns me to an army, without saying I'm 
working off those 3 months. Then I'll ignore that marshall whenever I want.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss