[Discuss] cheating or just smart?

[Timothy Collett]

On Apr 15, 2008, at 7:31 PM, psymann wrote:
> Hmm, if you secede in order to create a second realm to wage war with
> one, as in this case, but the capital is _not_ closer, would that  
> still
> count as strategic?  It's strategic, but only to bypass the treaty,  
> not
> to take advantage of game mechanics... so how would that be  
> considered?
>  I'd be tempted to say that was ok...
>
> *looks over to Timothy hopefully*

The primary reason a strategic secession is an abuse is because of  
capital-only recruitment.  If you're seceding for reasons that have  
nothing to do with OOC-reason-imposed gameplay restrictions, I don't  
see any reason to call that abuse.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss