[Discuss] Strategic secessions (was:Re: Life without a Judge)

[Talita CS]

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Robert Croson, Jr <robert at arcm.com> wrote:

>
>  We have all the hallmark's of a strategic secession right there in Fontan's own
>  newspaper:

Question: Is friendly secession the same as strategic secession? This
is an honest question, since I have been for short, and don't know
what you guys define each by, and the downside of each.
- Is it considered strategic secession/colonization, when a realm
decides to make a colony in the enemy's heart, to make sure a king
that is on their side rules over what used to be enemy lands?
History-wise it seems ok with me, but game-wise I don't know. As I see
it, strategic includes having a puppet realm, or something like it.

Also - how are colony takeovers seen, when the colony is to be
friendly to the mother realm?
Question being: would the whole discussion be void if we had merely
started a CTO instead of regularly TOing it?

Third and Last: Is this such a huge problem because of the secession
RP (or how it should be when people usually secede - anger, treason,
etc)? If so, how to solve it, now? Wasn't all the arguing prior to the
secession good enough to replace long diplomatic discussions that
would happen afterwards?

Talita


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss