[Discuss] Brainstorming: Limiting Large Alliances (Take 42)

[Tom]

On 10/10/2007 05:00 PM, John P. Murphy wrote:
> It should not be easy or practically automatic to renew alliances.   
> This could couple nicely with my suggestion that rulers should have  
> to travel and meet in order to sign agreements: if it's just a matter  
> of spending some gold and clicking a link, there won't be much soul- 
> searching over a huge cross-continent alliance.

One simple solution would have it requiring at least one ruler involved 
being in his capital, and maybe the other being at least in a city or 
stronghold.


>   Making the rulers  
> travel also can enforce an interesting dynamic: if one realm's king  
> is forced to travel to the other realm's capital to sign an alliance  
> to protect his kingdom, that really shows who's the junior partner,  
> right?

Hm, that is a very interesting solution. Maybe as an alternative?




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss