[Discuss] The Different Titles

[Chuong Huynh]

On 10/6/07, Siang Hong <siangperng at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/6/07, Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org> wrote:
> > LilWolf schrieb:
> > > Could we revert the "everyone is a baron/baroness" change? Really, I
> > > never saw the different titles cause any confusion.
> > >
> >
> > There's a reason for this change in addition to that. I want to
> > streamline the hierarchy and make more things possible, but that
> > requires a solid foundation first.
> >
> > For example, with the new code that handles the baron/duke thing, it is
> > also possible to differentiate titles by more than just region type. I
> > could use region size if I wanted to, or any other factors. Most
> > importantly, I might even add custom titles, not necessarily in the
> > sense that you can make up your own, but in the sense that your realm
> > can choose from several available "sets".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribing and other list options:
> > http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
> Baron does not sound as nice as Count/Earl; to me at least. Why not
> everyone becomes a Count.


I agree, I think they should be giving the generic term of Lord, as it says
in their  rank. Like a  duke is ranked a duke, why not call all lords simply
lord instead of baron/baroness. That way you leave open the RP and they can
still call themselves baron, count, marquis as they did before without
having to trump game mechanics.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss-moderated/attachments/20071006/68195202/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss