[Discuss] Rules of BM Need to be Stressed More

[fodder]

Tom Vogt wrote:

> 
> I can't even begin to tell how offensive I find that, as a player and GM.
> 
> Setting them free again, ok.
> Talking to the noble in question if he's doing it purely for 
> entertainment, well ok.
> 
> But "restitution"???
> 
> That judge is positively insane, and I don't mean as in "funny", I 
> really mean as in mentally ill. In modern terms that's like breaking 
> into the zoo (happens), setting the animals free (happens, rarely) and 
> giving them money so they can take the next place home (insane).
> 

related....

If a commoner works for a duke (or judge, for example) would they count 
as the property of the said noble?

if the said property is damaged by another noble (locked up, etc).. 
would it make sense for the judge to fine the noble.... money doesn't go 
to commoner as restitution or anything like that... but as compensation 
to the "owner" of the property?


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss