[Discuss] abusing the strip titles option?

[Märt Reose]

Tessa wrote:
> Of course there is a difference between IC and OOC. But I know of no 
> other option which is designed to to make you argue against something 
> you -know- isn't true, which in itself makes any argument futile, in my 
> opinion. Because it causes stuff like this:
> 
> ~strips lord of nobility~
> "That, my lord, is a gross abuse of power! You tyrant!"
> "That's  a power invested in me with rulership, it's not abuse. Do you 
> cry foul play when the judge uses his power of execution? No. Stop 
> complaining."
> 
> It's just pointless to argue, why? Because the ruler -knows- he is 
> justified through game messages. Your character -knows- he is justified 
> through game messages, but in fact you the player -know- that the ruler 
> is right and you are wrong. But you're still supposed to argue it for 
> the sake of arguing it? That to me is not roleplaying, it's a 
> calculated, planned,  and coded means of causing problems which need not 
> occur all for the sake of making something happen. It irks me. Of 
> course, that's just the way I see it, it's probably not intended that 
> way at all.
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
> http://mail.aol.com
I didnt plan to cause problems.. the ruler just stripped my char... like 
wtf...


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss