[Discuss] Claims

[Timothy Collett]

On May 26, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> I think that's the point.  That is if claims were removed then they  
> really
> would have to fear utter destruction.  Although, if I were in such  
> a realm I
> might prefer it to be destroyed then to live on in some permanently
> subservient state.

You misunderstand.  We don't *want* to destroy the realm: we just  
want to take some regions.  *They* are the ones making it a war to  
the death.  If there were no claims, we'd just keep trying for peace  
while defending the lands we've taken, and if they won't accept  
peace, then we'll just let the official status of war stay there  
until they get bored banging their heads against a wall.

> Letting realms die and making it easier for new ones to be created  
> will result in a healthier gaming environment.

Now this I wholeheartedly agree with.  Especially with the duchy  
becoming more of a focal point, and trying to do away with  
nationalism (to some degree), having realms be more transient  
entities would definitely go a long way toward making the game more  
fluid and fun.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family

--

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can  
change the world.  Indeed it's the only thing that ever has."
  - Margaret Mead




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss