[Discuss] Adventurer questions

[Jamie Cheyfetz]

On 5/25/07, Samuel Knowlton <sam at iamsam.org> wrote:
>
> Our adventurers in BM are really neither of these. They are the third type,
> which is more like the lowest-born bastard of the lowest branch of your
> family. The noble blood in them is so thin that they have no claim to
> nobility and have to do amazing things to get such a claim. If Duke Bob has
> an illegitimate child with Countess Jane, their child is not going to be an
> adventurer. If Duke Bob has a child with the cook, then it's possible.

Speak for your own bastards.  Everyone gets to RP their character's
background (within reason) as they see fit.  It would have been enough
to say that the third type was an unacknowledged bastard.  One you
don't even say is yours, no matter how obvious it may be.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss