News

[Discuss] Estates Problems

Timothy Collett danaris at mac.com
Fri May 4 12:39:56 CEST 2007


On Friday, May 04, 2007, at 01:53AM, "Jamie Cheyfetz" <jamie.cheyfetz at gmail.com> wrote:
>A suggestion:
>
>Allow the realm that was defeated to choose another realm that will
>inherit all of their claims.  *That* would give attackers a reason to
>stop their wars with peace rather than just obliterating their enemy.

You miss the point.

The problem most (I think) have been complaining of in this thread is that there is no incentive for the *defenders* to accept or offer a peace treaty: they know that if they surrender, they'll only be a shadow of their former selves, and think it more worthwhile to force the attackers to destroy them, thus damaging their reputation and making the claims last a long time.

It is, of course, quite ridiculous, and almost no one of the time would have acted that way (unless they were mad).  But since there is really no significant negative consequence to the players (or even the characters!) for having their realm destroyed, it becomes a pretty viable option.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family

(No laptop, no sigs :-( )



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


More information about the Discuss-moderated mailing list