[Discuss] Re: Proposed Marshal changes

[Alex Davies]

>From: James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com>
>Alex Davies wrote:
>>
>>How does that solve the issue that the archers don't need to refit at the 
>>same time as the cav, or inf, which typically take more casualties?
>>
>And what difference does it make?  Do you leave your archers on the 
>battlefield all by themselves?  No, they go an refit with the rest of the 
>army.  What type of unit and how often people have to refit is irrelevant.  
>Chances are most of your units are going to take a similar amount of 
>damage.  What Tom did just requires more coordination and use of armies, as 
>he said, as armies and not blobs.
>

No, I wouldn't leave archer son their own in the field, I'd leave them with 
inf. Which I can't do, unelss there's separate armies for cavalry, infantry 
and archers, which is what I could see working for larger realms, but not 
smaller ones.

If I have a 12K army left after a battle and 8K of that needs to refit, I'd 
still leave the 4K to hold the field usually. Can't do that now, and I don't 
see why not. As Samuel said, most people will probably just refrain from 
using marshal settings at all.

The1exile (AKA SniperChief)

Clarity is the essence of beauty, mystery the essence of desire.

_________________________________________________________________
Could you be the guest MSN Movies presenter? Click Here to Audition 
http://www.lightscameraaudition.co.uk



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss