[Discuss] Re: Proposed Marshal changes

[Christopher Subich]

Alex Davies wrote:
>> From: Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org>
>> Now youu can be sure whose settings will affect which nobles. That's a 
>> _lot_ of gained reliability in planning.

> are occasionally missing entirely), the army system won't be used - or 
> people will stick everyone they can into one big army and be done with it.

Exactly.

The planning is more detailed, but the "randomness" was controlled 
before.  Now, where there was redundancy (many marshalls with the same 
settings, to cover an absence), there are now multiple points of failure.

A marshall pausing, getting wounded, or simply getting delayed on the 
eve of battle can now be disastrous.  This is not reliability.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss