[Discuss] An observation
Lyman Stone
lymanstone at alltel.net
Fri Jun 8 16:33:58 CEST 2007
> Are you actually suggesting that there is a historical basis for
> weeks of
> prolonged peasant resistance to nobles after land changed hands?
>
> Popular sovereignty as an idea did not come around until the second
> half of
> the 17th century, and had absolutely nothing to do with serfs and very
> little application to medieval feudalism -- it's about 300 years
> too late.
> There is absolutely no "consent of the governed" in an agrarian,
> feudal
> society.
It is impossible to rule without consent of the governed. If they do
not revolt against you, then they consent. Now, of course, death may
be the result of them not consenting. But it's still a choice they
made. Militant popular sovereignty is the idea that popular
sovereignty may be expressed through revolts or rebellions.
Also, if there is a peasant militia, there is probably some local
beaurocrat or minor noble who is leading them. And I would daresay
there are examplesof peasants holding out for weeks, months, even
years. One example of peasants lead by a minor nobleman for an
extraordinarily long time after the rulerof an area changedwould be
Robin Hood. Now, of course, it wasn't a TO I suppose, but it was
still peasants holding out. Or you can just look at the common
banditry of the middle ages.
>
> BS. The game forces you to spend your time doing bookkeeping if you
> actually
> want to hang on to your regions. Again, I like this as a reasonable
> aspect
> of the game. It makes sense. The present implementation is far too
> extreme,
> and none of the examples you gave are either good history or good game
> design.
Did I say if you wanted to hold onto your regions? No. Now, if your
realm is very small, there is precious little bookeeping to be done.
But a larger realm, will have a fair bit. Whatever the case, you
wanting to hold onto your regions is your choice. But do remember, in
the actual middle ages, when the nobles went off to war, that was the
time when locals back home got restless. Maybe nobles in the middle
ages didn't do that beaurocracy.
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list