News

[Discuss] An observation

Robert Croson, Jr robert at arcm.com
Thu Jun 7 19:29:09 CEST 2007


On 7 Jun 2007 at 12:50, Samuel Knowlton wrote:

-----8<----- Massive snippage. Good stuff, but it doesn't need quoted.

> Historically, there is no basis at all for the sheer level of region 
> maintenance required. Lords were very rarely "at home" at usually left 
> seneschals or castellans to manage things for them. Things were set up so 
> that, if you were actually there yourself, you would get even more benefit 
> from your land because, wow, the lord actually left the (King's/Duke's) 
> court to come all the way out here. But if you weren't there, you may not 
> get the benefit, but you wouldn't be as penalized as you are in BM.

With the way the new estate systems works, some of this will be mitigated for 
established regions that are part of your realm. If you can get your estates set 
up properly, they will help increase production and reduce independence in a 
region. This should greatly ease the bureaucratic workload.

It will, of course, also make frehsly taken land harder to control...

-- 
Rob

On a mining ship, three million years into deep space,
can someone explain to me where the smeg I got this traffic cone?
-- Lister, Red Dwarf




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


More information about the Discuss-moderated mailing list