[Discuss] Friendly secessions

[Alex Davies]

>From: Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org>
>Vinnie schrieb:
>>Is there any other reaseon except for "Tom doesn't want the titans to
>>even remotely look like a court system"?
>
>Yes, discussed on this list at least five times. Check the archives.
>

Checked the archives... 
http://news.battlemaster.org/archives/discuss-moderated/2007-May/010628.html

There what it says is "A system with low visibility is a good system in my 
eyes."

The thing is, their visibility is not low (everyone knows about the titans, 
as well they should, considering they are the enforcers of the rules), only 
their transparency, and there is a big *big* difference there. We can see 
the titans but as we don't see what they're doing right, the view towards 
them is naturally biased and only leads to people being afraid to talk about 
them.

Can we get a reason that is acceptable to everyone to give the titans some 
credit, rather than just taking it on faith? It's hard to trust their 
judgement when most of what you hear is their wrong decisions, or when 
you're the one who feels wronged and can't actually talk to anyone about it 
(because it will generally be shot down as whining) or don't get a response 
through the proper channels.

On a slightly related note, I would like to hear a reason why the titans 
dopn't have an anonymous email to use to reply to mails sent to 
titans at news.battlemaster.org, something that was suggested last time as one 
of the more minor changes.

The1exile (AKA SniperChief)

Clarity is the essence of beauty, mystery the essence of desire.

_________________________________________________________________
Play your part in making history - Email Britain! 
http://www.emailbritain.co.uk/



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss