[Discuss] Friendly secessions

[Vinnie]

2007/6/3, Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org>:
> Vinnie schrieb:
> > That's another discussion. I've said a few times already it would help
> > if any and all decisions by the titans were made public.
>
> No, it wouldn't. The court system is open and it works well because not
> only the decisions but also all details of the trial are public. If only
> the decisions were public, there would be chaos and confusion. You can't
> have a half-open system. Which is precisely why I say time and time
> again that the Titans are _not_ a court/trial system. As long as the
> argument revolves around essentially demanding that they are, the
> argument is in a dead end.

Is there any other reaseon except for "Tom doesn't want the titans to
even remotely look like a court system"? Because I'm convinced that it
would work way better. Give defense limited possibility to DEFEND and
make everything public. Except for "it's not a court" I haven't seen
why not?
>
> > Then we would
> > see what good things they're doing, and we wouldn't see stuff like
> > "but they didn't do anything about Plergoth OOC invasion!". Because at
> > least we would know what they did to look into it and why they did not
> > take action.
>
> The very people who complain about this long-ago incident know fully
> well that it was looked into, because they were the ones who sent in
> Titans complaints and got them rejected.
>
> They don't complain because the Titans didn't act. They complain because
> the Titans didn't act in the way they wanted them to act.

Exactly. Which proves that it would be better if all decisions are public.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss