[Discuss] Moving
Timothy Collett
danaris at mac.com
Thu Jul 19 17:20:25 CEST 2007
On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Charles Filson wrote:
> I would say that you are loyal only to your liege...then your liege
> is loyal to his liege and so on up to the King. Any sense of realm
> loyalty should come from this chain of allegiance. At least that is
> how I would read it.
No: you are directly *sworn* to your liege, and answerable to him,
and he to his liege, and he to the King. However, you are still
(expected to be) *loyal* to your liege, your Duke, *and* your King,
provided said loyalties do not directly conflict.
I have heard the argument you make used to justify breaking realm
laws and other such foolish things, which is *not* the way the system
should work, by my understanding.
Timothy Collett
Anaris Family
--
"You'll excuse me, but I'm in the middle of fifteen things, all of
them annoying."
~ Susan Ivanova
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list