[Discuss] Starting a Rebellion

[Nate Shupe]

>From: "Miles" <qmiles78 at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: discuss at news.battlemaster.org
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Starting a Rebellion
>Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:05:41 -0500
>
>"James" <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:mailman.10084.1183571413.2568.discuss at news.battlemaster.org...
> > Miles wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> That would be a nice option, but as it stands this is the only way to 
>get
> >> it done (as has been stated).  If you want to get technical we voted in
> >> someone who volunteered to get dethroned, so in a sense we have a 
>problem
> >> with the current leader. ;)
> >>  Regardless, we've all been there for over two weeks, a few of us have
> >> well over 15 prestige.. but no one can start the rebellion.  Should I
> >> post this as a bug, or just sit tight?  I guess the other problem is 
>the
> >> realm might be too new for a rebellion.
> >
> > If Tom wanted this as an option, don't you think it would be one?  And
> > again, it is not the only way to get it done.
>
>Do I think Tom has considered every possible game option anyone could ever
>think of and implemented them all before any of us had ever played this
>game?
>
>No.
>
>As for slipping into anarchy, that sounds a tidge more difficult than an
>awkward rebellion.
>

Again, what's wrong with just starting the colony in anarchy?  There's no 
government set yet, and obviously no ruler.  Why can't the first ruler just 
form a new government of choice from the anarchy?

It's true, Tom has said things on the topic before, but that's never stopped 
him from changing something by popular request.

_________________________________________________________________
http://liveearth.msn.com



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss