[Discuss] Adventures taxed! Very lame...

[Robert Croson, Jr]

On 3 Jan 2007 at 14:46, James Marshall wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:11:59 +0530, Vin <vin.raigavin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> >From: "Aaron Champion" <achampion at gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >On 1/3/07, Vin <vin.raigavin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Taxed 10 gold, TITAN's look into the matter. You must be having more
> >> than
> >> >>100 gold.. ^^
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >There is no reason why an adventurer having a lot of gold requires
> > Titan
> >> >intervention.
> >>
> >> I'm pretty sure he was joking...
> >>
> >>
> > Half true. I was rather saying that if that adventurer was taxed 10 gold
> > (i
> > mean, 10 gold missing from his pool), then he might very well be having
> > more
> > than 100 gold. Which would have only been possible, when he was in a
> > guild,
> > promoted to a full member, accessed the treasury page and pulled gold out
> > of
> > it quickly before Tom put up that restriction.
> 
> Or they had a Unique Item that someone was willing to pay handsomely for...
> 
> Or have sold many items for good money...

Could be true in both cases. My adventurer just pulled into town with about 15 
gold in gems on him. Luckily I didn't sell them all, or I might have been taxed, 
too. If I had gotten a bit more lucky, I could easily see someone selling a rather 
large amount of items for some good money. There are gems worth over 5 gold 
each that have already been discovered.

But unique items are the most likely explanation. If the item was good enough, 
and the right buyer was found, then it is very possible that the sale price could 
have gone over 100 gold.



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss