[Discuss] Assasinating priests
Alexander Keül
zakath at online.no
Sat Dec 22 18:22:24 CET 2007
> > This is certainly a valid point, but really it's getting ridiculous.
> My
> > priest is wounded more often than healthy, which is frankly not all
> that
> > fun. And, priests have no defense.
> >
> Sure they do. They have the same defence that any class without a unit
> and ith equivalent infil and sword skill has.
The problem there is that a priest has very little income so he can't really
train at the academy. Nor will he gain sword skill from battles, since he
won't participate in any.
> Not if they don't believe in the religion.Heck, my infil regularly
> targeted enemy priests simply becuase while his religion was officially
> not allowed to call them
> evil/misguided/going-to-burn-in-hell-for-all-eternity-and-all-our-
> adherents-must-lynch-them,
> he wasn't tied down by the same restraints. Also, he's now a priest,
> and
> as yet unstabbed :-)
You have an advantage if you were skilled with a sword beforehand. My priest
isn't hopeless with a sword, but an infil is better, and with so many of
them running loose they're bound to get it right sooner or later :)
Alex
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list