News

[Discuss] Adventurer tactics

Jonathon Taylor jonathon.its.never.enough at googlemail.com
Wed Aug 1 17:32:50 CEST 2007


On 01/08/07, Timothy Collett <danaris at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Gloria Santos wrote:
> > Even using the maximum risk it's hard to find the monsters...
> > Using a lower risk makes it almost impossible.  So why have all the
> > options if we all use maximum risk most of the time anyway?
>
> There *are* places where there are lots of monsters/undead, and you
> can find plenty using the normal or stealthy options.  In places like
> that, using maximum risk really would give you more chance of getting
> wounded or killed.
>
> At least, they're *supposed* to exist.
>
> I've *heard* of them...
>
> I think...
>
> Timothy Collett
> Anaris Family


I can vouch for that, their was one in Poitra. But, it was so damn
difficult, every time you hunted for the Monsters (or were they undead?
Hmm...), irrespectable of the level of intensity you hunted them at they
always wounded you and they were only group 3. Then they just disappeared,
that or some hard-case finally beat them and probably got a load of stuff
and likely a unique item for it.




-- 
The Bridges Fall To The Ground,
And You Say You Have Sacrificed?

                           (\__/)
                           (='.'=)
                           (")_(")
This is Bunny. Copy and paste him into your signature to help him gain world
domination.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss-moderated/attachments/20070801/a67cc445/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


More information about the Discuss-moderated mailing list