[Discuss] Titan Reform Proposal

[Alex Davies]

>From: "Anthony Anderson" <phoenixsunrise at gmail.com>
>And how is the message received when they get punished not a good way to
>tell people what they did wrong?  As for any changes, that's not anything
>the Titans can do on their own.  They just work with what they've got.
>

What if the message is unclear, or they're told they broke some rule that 
isn't written down somewhere they can find? There's plenty of reasons you 
might want clarification. As for any changes, well, that's what this thread 
is about, isn't it?

>
>The feudal system wasn't really the best thing in the world either.  We've
>moved away from that, too.  Should we scrap the entire hierarchy?  No.
>
>Allowing a defense would only result in people complaining that the accuser
>doesn't have a chance to further prove their point, or at least argue
>against the counterpoints.  Enter then, complaints that the defense only
>gets one chance to prove their innocence.  Continue, ad nauseum.  Tom hates
>people lawyering.  Why create a situation where those people get even more
>opportunities to do just that?

Well, for a start, because of fairness. Any argument that the original 
reporter doesn't get a chance to argue is foolish in and of itself. Yiou 
didn't include the right details in your original report? Tough, it warns 
you on the titan page that you only get one shot. Allowing for a defence 
isn't the same thing - that's just asking for equality.

It's a pity that in a game as well developed and well thought out in BM, we 
have a titan system that has many more peple thinking it leaves much to be 
desired.

The1exile (AKA SniperChief)

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane 
mittam.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Hotmail is evolving - check out the new Windows Live Hotmail 
http://get.live.com/betas/mail_betas



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss