[Discuss] Feature Suggestion: Question Title
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Apr 17 14:37:14 CEST 2007
>From: "Samuel Knowlton" <sam at iamsam.org>
> >> Maybe the random honor loss is not strict enough for such a serious
>action. What about increasing the penalty to further deter casual usage of
>the feature?
>
>The last two times I saw this happen, people lost dozens of points of
>honor. The ruler lost an additional 15-20 points on top of everything else.
>
>The penalty is actually too high, as far as I'm concerned, because it isn't
>used to punish the behavior it's intended to punish and it is used for
>another purpose.
While I realise this is fantasctically naive in it's trusting of people to
actually RP correctly, maybe there should be an option for the stripped
nobles to claim his nobility, thus incurring the honour penalty, rather than
making it automatic?
It might never get used, but I think that if there was a choice to rebel on
the disrespectful ruler or lose a ton of honour, it would create a lot more
friction between the stripped noble and the ruler, who would both have the
ability to call support, while not removing the very serious risk of mass
damage that comes from using the option. And if people are seriously RPing
not being noble, then maybe they'll not use it at all.
The1exile (AKA SniperChief)
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane
mittam.
_________________________________________________________________
Solve the Conspiracy and win fantastic prizes.
http://www.theconspiracygame.co.uk/
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list