[Discuss] Buy Title issue
James Marshall
james at akkuze.net
Thu Apr 12 17:02:11 CEST 2007
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:00:57 -0400, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Alex Davies wrote:
>>
>> Not really, no. Don't exaggerate. If you don't want to risk having
>> your important nobles hit hard, don't put them in the line of fire.
>> But if you do, then don't be surprised if they get hit. Simple enough.
>> You'd be surprised how stable your government can be if you elect a
>> buro as ruler.
>>
>
> But you can't expect everyone to do that. And we're not talking about
> rulers, we're talking about dukes and other region lords. You cannot
> order them to be bureaucrats. I honestly want a feasible way to keep
> your dukes from being wounded or imprisoned as you offered. Even
> staying in a single region with militia is not a safe guard, because
> after they take all your other regions because no one is defending it,
> they will take that city (which now has a lot less CS) with everything
> and there will still be people wounded or imprisoned and the same thing
> can happen all over again.
..aah! The intrigue and political fun that will abound!
If you take part in battles there's always the chance to get wounded or imprisoned, so if you want a feasible way for that not to happen, then they need to avoid any battles, and where's the fun in that?
Refer to first sentence... :)
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list