[Discuss] Banned nobles can't protest

[Robert Croson, Jr]

On 19 Sep 2006 at 13:56, AJ wrote:

> A banned noble should be allowed because a single noble protesting will have no effect on the 
> judge's standing. But for a runaway judge who bans half or more of the realm on a whim, it 
> _will_ have an effect. And if the lot of banned nobles are supported by a few not banned, the 
> judge by be deposed.

Banned nobles can still rebel. And if the judge really was a "runaway judge", 
the rebellion may have the support of some of the nobles still left. Assuming, of 
course, that the remaining nobles don't support the judge, in which case the 
banned half should just go off and find a new place to call home.

-- 
Rob

Where no hope is left, is left no fear.
-- John Milton




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss