[Discuss] OOC Bans

[Philippe Veillette]

AJ wrote:
> On 9/4/06, *D. Nicko* <la_romana2 at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:la_romana2 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I have a question about a situation that may merit an OOC ban.  A
>     player in one of my realms, where I play the ruler, has been accused
>     of multi-cheating.  The accusation comes from another player who
>     also is the ruler in the realm of the other two of
>     player-in-question's characters.  The other realm was where the
>     offense was discovered.  Both characters were banned and the account
>     has since been locked. 
> 
>     My question is: Since I don't have any solid evidence other than a
>     locked account and the word of one person, is an OOC Ban
>     appropriate?  (my initial reaction would say yes, but I wanted to be
>     sure).
> 
> 
> 
> That is what the titans are there. If you have suspicions of someone 
> multicheating, report them to the Titans. They will look into the 
> matter. Or report them to Tom. But OOC banning for multicheating on your 
> own should be based or solid, incontrovertible proof.
> 
> And if an account is already locked, why bother OOC banning them? They 
> will eventually autopause.
> 
> aJ
> -- 
> bLogging at - http://ramblings.ajaxed.net

If an account is locked by the game master, Doing as Ashborn did is 
STUPID and the next one that I see doing that will lose his title.

If for some reason the lock was not warranted, that impulsive ruler 
would have OOC banned someone for no good reason.  Don't the OOC-ban 
page say to not abuse it?



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss