[Discuss] Are Priests still not able to rule?

[Thomas Dalton]

> No. The ruler of a theocracy is not a priest anymore. He might be a
> religious figure, but he's not going to stand on the market square,
> preaching.

But he's not a soldier, bureaucrat, trader, etc. either. He's a
theologian, even if he isn't actually preaching.

Prehaps priests should be allowed to rule, but have the preach option
disabled. It could be replaced by something it help convert nobles
(ability to send a message to the whole continent, maybe? Or just
everyone in his realm and neighbouring realms?). It makes sense for a
ruling priest to concentrate on converting the nobility, rather than
standing on market squares talking to peasents.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss